Monday, November 30, 2009

Revisiting the Powell Doctrine

Some of the central figures in the Bush Admini...Image via Wikipedia

Alexander Wolf, a PhD candidate at the University of the Armed Forces, Munich, and a research assistant at the Academy for Politics and Current Affairs had a piece in the Winter issue of Strategic Studies Quarterly: U.S. Interventions Abroad: A Renaissance of the Powell Doctrine?. In his piece he suggests that “By chronicling the doctrinal premises of US intervention policy during the “interwar years” (1990–2001)1 and the administration of George W. Bush (2001–2008), it will demonstrate that the “smart power” approach of the Obama administration suggests continuity over radical change.” Wolf writes that “despite a liberal humanitarian orientation that in principle should look favorably on intervention, Washington will consider employing its military forces—when necessary, unilaterally and preemptively—only to protect vital US interests and only when confronted by immediate security threats.”

He then brought up the Powell Doctrine (shelved for years over the Bush Doctrine), which “offers a promising framework for military intervention” and why it should be considered in connection with Washington’s interest-based policy approach. With the President scheduled to deliver the much anticipated “way-forward” in Afghanistan, I think it would be interesting to revisit the Powell Doctrine. The following excerpted from Mr. Wolf’s paper:

[T]he Powell Doctrine begins with the interest-based decision to intervene and formulates an operational catalogue of criteria for the “proper” execution of military intervention. Accordingly, the military should only be put to use when:

(1) The national interest requires it;

(2) The number of troops employed corresponds with the mission they are to execute;

(3) The mission is clearly defined, both politically and militarily;

(4) The size, composition, and disposition of the troops is constantly being reevaluated;(5) The operation has the support of both the Congress and the American people; and

(6) There is a clear exit strategy.

He further writes that “the operational criteria to be fulfilled according to the Powell Doctrine are meant to set up barriers to the ill-considered commitment of military forces in poorly planned operations and to help prevent “mission creep,” the unplanned escalation of a conflict.” He cited as primary example of a military intervention carried out in accordance with the Powell Doctrine, the US-led Operation Desert Storm, conducted under UN auspices for the liberation of Kuwait in 1991.”

Related Item: Alexander Wolf | U.S. Interventions Abroad: A Renaissance of the Powell Doctrine?Strategic Studies Quarterly | Winter 2009

Diplopundit's Blog Index for November 2009

2009 Influenza Pandemic: Border Entry Issues

Fm the Good News Dept: Mobile Computing for State

SFRC Report: How We Failed to Get Osama bin Laden

Video of the Week: Ian Goldin: Navigating our global future.

What Are We Doing in Afghanistan?

Ambassador Neumann on Corruption in Afghanistan

Reconsider the Role of the PRTs?

Happy Thanksgiving!

SFRC Website Finally Gets a Make Over, Sort Of

Hard Skills Training Center at Old Smelting Plant

Warning on Espionage Got China’s Attention

Squirrels Are Us?

There are families at US Embassy Kabul?

Terror Charges: From Minneapolis to Somalia

Vice Consul James Hogan: 1,440 Hours Missing

Quickie: Senator LeMieux, Brazil is Waiting

Ambassador David Jacobson: Applicant for the Day

Espionage Conspiracy: Myers Couple Pleads Guilty

JFK - November 22, 1963

Video of the Week: Pranav Mistry's Trilling SixthSense

Confirmed: Polt, Stroum, Prahar, Huebner, Tefft

Confirmed: Fernandez, Barton, Kennard, Lomellin, King

Confirmed: Hudson, Yohannes and Arnavat

A Word on Diplomacy 3.0

Quickie: Senator LeMieux on Thomas Shannon and LatAm

Officially In: David Adelman to Singapore

Officially In: Harry K. Thomas, Jr. to Manila

Officially In: Elizabeth Littlefield to OPIC

HRC Presents Heroism Award to Matt Sherman

Rodearmel v. Clinton: Appeal to SCOTUS Filed

Officially In: Eight for the Broadcasting Board of Gov

Insider Quote: I was qualified to be in the SFS

SFRC Hearings: Rowe, Fernandez, Wills, Goldberg

The Governator Visits US Embassy Baghdad

SFRC Clears 14 State Dept Nominations

SFRC Hearings: The Warlicks, Tsakopoulos Kounalakis

Special Agent Fred Ketchem: DS Employee of the Year

Officially In: Scott H. DeLisi to Kathmandu

Officially In: Beatrice Welters to Port-of-Spain

S. 1524: USAID Reform Bill Scheduled for Mark Up

Quickie: English Lessons Via Mobile Phones

Remember When: Policy on Wives of Foreign Service Off

Urgent and Critical Assistance Needed

The Secretary of State’s SOSA Awardees 2009

Peace Corps to Return to Indonesia

Quote: Married to the Service in the 50’s

Snapshot: State Dept's Family Member Employment

Video of the Week: Lonely Hearts Scam Division

Get Ready for the RiceHadley Strategy Group

Peter Galbraith in the News Again

Jumping the Gunman

Quickie: TelConference With Ambassador Eikenberry

Obama’s UN-Mgt Reform Nominee's Troubles

AFSA 2009: Four Post Election Possibilities

Did we legally adopt Afghanistan while we were asleep

Confirmed: Jeffrey Bleich to Australia

Officially In: Laura Kennedy to US-CD

Officially In: Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe to US-HR...

Officially In: Carrie Hessler Radelet to Peace Corps

Kosovo Honors Bill with a Statue on Bill Clinton Ave

Officially In: Dr. Rajiv Shah to USAID

USDA Official Rajiv Shah to USAID?

AFSA 2009 Election Challenged

The Berlin Wall: 20th Anniversary

Don’t Tell Me – Another "Idle Curiosity" Case

Quickie: Joe Klein on Hillary's Moment

The Linguists Are Coming ... From DOD?

The Ambassador: When Working for One is an Adventure

Video of the Week: National Leadership Index 2009

Afghanistan: Ticks with CCHF Virus?

Confirmed: At Last - Arturo Valenzuela to WHA!

Snapshot: Top 10 Recipients of US Foreign Aid

H1N1 Vaccine for Foreign Service Personnel

23 US Officials: Rendered Guilty in Italy

Quickie: Foreign Service 2009 Promotion Lists

Quote: Diplomats, Not Meant to Sell Widgets

Colton v. Clinton: Amended Complaint Alleges Retaliation

SFRC Hearings: Bleich, Huebner, King

Horn v. Huddle: DOJ Settles Suit for $3 million

SFRC Hearings: Zeitlin, Arvanat, Barton, Yohannes

Nov 4: The Day the Roof Fell In

SIGAR Report: Sinks in Its Lightness of Being

Officially In: Suresh Kumar to USFCS

Insider Quote: Sometimes there are obstacles

Best Consular Blog. Dead, So Very Dead.

US Embassy Kabul: Honoring DEA Agents Lost

The AFSA Challenge: Prove This Theory Wrong

Quickie: The FS Blogosphere in 2009

Diplopundit’s Blog Index for October 2009

Health News of the Day

Health News of the Day is a daily summary made from the selected links I post on Twitter. It is in a bullet points format with links to the original sources which include 350 RSS feeds that produce about 2,500 items per day:

Higher ARB doses work better in CHF than lower ARB doses - up-titrating reduced the rate of death or admission http://bit.ly/6uNiZh

Number of Americans with diabetes will double over the next 25 years, spending on the disease will triple http://bit.ly/4HiRZ9

Hand sanitizer: How it protects you - CNN http://bit.ly/66tVMc

As of 2010, the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) will no longer offer open access http://bit.ly/78joCV - Letter from the Publisher: No longer free for all.

Dirty pigs are healthy pigs - Study finds link between outdoor living and immune health http://bit.ly/8FtuQI

Medical news tweets are not research articles - they are 140-character messages - please always go to the original source, links, etc. Tweets and links do not represent endorsement, approval or support. Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.

Follow me on Twitter:

Social Media Related Tweets and Insights

From my Twitter account:

Is the H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Safe? - Diagram by Information Is Beautiful http://bit.ly/8dvPHk

Micro-blogging vs Mega-blogging - by Matt Mullenweg, founder of WordPress. "New forms of social media, including micro-blogging, are complementary to blogging." http://bit.ly/5nkN5q

"A single negative review or comment on Twitter, Facebook or Youtube can lose companies as many as 30 customers" http://bit.ly/8APXVC

"The oldest continuous medical blog - 10 years is forever in the world of blogs" http://bit.ly/7r6QpR and http://bit.ly/7Zpjvu

How Does Twitter Grader Calculate Twitter Rankings? http://bit.ly/1mwrw2 - check your score here: http://bit.ly/MPGmY -- Blog Grader http://bit.ly/m3hLy and Twitter Grader http://bit.ly/MPGmY

Twitter Hospital Lists by State http://bit.ly/8WNupA

Newsweek: Cleveland Clinic is both highly effective and fiercely efficient http://bit.ly/5WUGP4

@paulocoelho: Cloning Confucius: The funniest people are the saddest ones.

Kindle, Nook and the other ebook readers may be the new "iPod" in terms of popularity and use in education http://bit.ly/81KocI

Tweets are not research articles - they are 140-character messages - please always go to the original source, links, etc. Tweets and links do not represent endorsement, approval or support. Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.

Health News of the Day

Health News of the Day is a daily summary made from the selected links I post on Twitter. It is in a bullet points format with links to the original sources which include 350 RSS feeds that produce about 2,500 items per day:

Extended-release niacin causes a regression of carotid intima–media thickness when combined with a statin http://bit.ly/4F97eT

Novel Antibody Against PBP Peptide Was Associated with 94% of Patients with Autoimmune Pancreatitis http://bit.ly/6mh6mp

Can we prevent diabetes type 1? Rituximab partially preserved beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes mellitus http://bit.ly/5KTcYl

New supersensitive troponin T correlated with risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure but not with MI http://bit.ly/7TmykR

Walking away or letting things pass may be an unhealthy way to deal with unfair treatment on the job, research shows. Men who used "covert" coping strategies were more than twice as likely to have a heart attack or die from heart disease http://bit.ly/5CfW22

Exercise simultaneously makes people hungrier, yet more readily satisfied by a meal http://bit.ly/6Nkzmo

An internist in Miami pays $50k a year more for liability insurance than an internist in Minnesota. A general surgeon in FL pays $180K more for liability insurance than one in MN http://bit.ly/4WFsSy - That's one internist's salary...

Physicians with names unique to medicine have a good sense of humor about the whole thing http://bit.ly/5XmdWA

Medical news tweets are not research articles - they are 140-character messages - please always go to the original source, links, etc. Tweets and links do not represent endorsement, approval or support. Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.

Follow me on Twitter:

Google Voice: Usage Statistics and My Experience



From Google Operating System:

Google Voice, which provides people with a single phone number that can be used to reach them on their work, home, or cell phones, has 1.419 million users.

Google Voice charges only for outbound calls to international locations; at present, fewer than 4% of all Google Voice users place outbound international calls.

Google emphasizes that Google Voice is not a phone service, it's a Web-based software application.

I have used Google Voice for about 2-3 years, when it was still a service called Grand Central, and my experience has been positive. You can embed a Google Voice widget in your blog sidebar which lets the website visitors call you without revealing your or their phone number. Google Voice automatically transcribes the voicemail as text and emails you a copy.

One of my colleagues was wondering if Google Voice can transcribe his dictations but this practice would not be HIPAA-compliant and may be against the terms of use of the service.


Nexus One - Google Voice

Updated: 01/18/2010

Sunday, November 29, 2009

2009 Influenza Pandemic: Border Entry Issues

The Congressional Research Service recently prepared a report on the 2009 Influenza Pandemic for Congress. The report provides a brief overview of selected legal issues including emergency measures, civil rights, liability issues, and employment issues. The report also contains interesting snippets on inadmissibility under INA, border quarantines and border closure.

Inadmissibility of Infected Aliens

Those most easily excluded from the United States are aliens already infected with the influenza A(H1N1) virus. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) specifically bars aliens who are determined to have “a communicable disease of public health significance,” from receiving visas and admission into the United States. “A communicable disease of public health significance” is defined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services by regulation. Although the regulatory definition does not specifically include influenza A(H1N1), it does include, by reference, communicable diseases as listed in a Presidential Executive Order issued pursuant to section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act. The relevant order, Executive Order 13295, as amended by Executive Order 13375, specifies “[i]nfluenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic” as a communicable disease for purposes of section 361(b). Thus, for purposes of the INA, the influenza A(H1N1) virus is a ground for inadmissibility into the United States. Of course, this law only applies to aliens, not citizens, and prior to inadmissibility being triggered, the alien must be diagnosed with the influenza A(H1N1) virus. These considerations could therefore prevent this provision from being the most effective means to interdict individuals infected with the influenza A(H1N1) virus from entering the country.

Border Quarantines of Citizens or Aliens

There are currently no legal provisions that can exclude American citizens from the United States solely because of an infection with a communicable disease. The primary means to prevent infected citizens from introducing these diseases into the United States is to place them into quarantine or isolation at the border rather than deny them entry outright. As noted above, the Secretary has the authority to promulgate regulations to prevent the entry and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States. The implementing regulations at 42 C.F.R. Part 71 specify that when there is reason to believe an arriving person is infected with “any communicable disease listed in an Executive Order, as provided under section 361(b) of the Public Service Act,” the person may be isolated, quarantined, or placed under surveillance or disinfected if deemed necessary to prevent the introduction of the communicable disease. “Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic” is one such disease that can warrant quarantine.

Closing the Border

The most drastic measure discussed so far is “to close the borders.” Presumably, this would entail a blanket bar on all aliens and citizens seeking entry into the United States regardless of their health. There appear to be no laws specifically authorizing an executive agency to take such action. However, Congress could presumably enact a law to do so, at least with regard to aliens, because the Supreme Court has long recognized “the power to expel or exclude aliens as a fundamental sovereign attribute that is largely immune from judicial control. However, United States citizens cannot be barred from entering the United States. Thus, if Congress were to theoretically “close the borders,” it could do so only by excluding aliens. In the absence of an act of Congress, it may be possible for the President to “close the borders” to aliens by Executive Order. However, this course of action appears to be fraught with legal and practical challenges, which would likely result in extensive litigation. Because Congress has not given the President authority to conduct blanket closings of borders, it would appear that the President could do so only if the exclusion power is one where he has concurrent authority with Congress. Although this exclusion power is characterized as a power “exercised by the Government’s political departments largely immune from judicial control,” the President appears to have rarely exercised any authority within this realm outside of the authority expressly delegated by an act of Congress. Considering the rather extensive inadmissibility regime codified within the Immigration and Nationality Act, it would appear unlikely that the President can exercise this power without express congressional authorization.

Read the whole thing here.

Fm the Good News Dept: Mobile Computing for State

Mobile ComputingImage by angermann via Flickr

Last week, I wrote about the Hard Skills Training Center, one of the State Department’s $600 million projects with funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are projects funded under ARRA at FSI and also at passport offices. Part of the Capital Investment Fund for FY 2009 (Stimulus Funds) are the following projects for $33,500,000 under the IT Platform:

Project One: Diplomatic Facility Telephone Systems Replacement - $10,000,000

Project Two: Replacement of Aging Desktop Computers (Global Information Technology Modernization (GITM) - $13,000,000

Project Three: Mobile Computing - $10,500,000

I’m quite sure the replacement of telephone systems and desktop computers would be welcomed everywhere, but the third project on mobile computing and remote access will probably be the most exciting news since Colin Powell got every desk wired for Internet access in the early part of this decade.

Below is a quick summary of the project from the Department’s ARRA plan:

This project will provide technological improvements to the Department of State Mobile Computing platform, increase the number of employees that have mobile access, and ensure continuity of operations for services such as Passport, Visa, and American Citizen Services. This project contains two parallel initiatives designed to expand remote access beyond the current 16,000 employees.

The first initiative will provide all new direct hire employees (approximately 5,000) remote access capabilities in FY2009 using the current systems. The second initiative will overhaul the existing Mobile Computing platform to provide full access to the Department of State’s unclassified resources and applications.

Mobile access is a key business requirement; however, the current infrastructure and devices are limited and do not provide the full functionality that the user requires to fulfill their mission anytime/anywhere. This initiative also increases the ability of employees worldwide to telework, both in support of “green” initiatives as well as responding to a crisis that might limit movement either domestically or overseas.

Objectives

1) Provide all new direct hire employees with remote access capabilities.

2) Provide diplomats and staff with the full suite of unclassified computer applications and resources when accessing the network from a computer that is outside the Department of State’s network (e.g. home or government provided computer).

3) Increase the number mobile devices supported.

4) Increase the infrastructure to support twice the current mobile workforce.

5) Reduce the carbon footprint of Department of State by enabling more users to telework.

6) Migrate existing Mobile Computing users to the new system.

Savings/Costs

1) It is estimated that an additional $600,000 is required for FY11 and beyond due to the increased customer base for mobile computing and additional operational staff will be required.

2) These costs will be funded via the Working Capital Fund (WCF) so the out-year costs will be provided by Mobile Computing subscribers, as is the current practice.

Measures

The primary measures of project success are:

1) Increasing the number of users that have remote access to unclassified resources

2) Increasing the number of applications available to mobile computing users

Related Item: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: External Program Plan

SFRC Report: How We Failed to Get Osama bin Laden

Tora BoraImage by Michael Foley Photography via Flickr

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) posted today its report titled “Tora Bora Revisited: How We Failed to Get Bin Laden and Why It Matters Today.” And in black and white print, it points fingers -- “the decision not to deploy American forces to go after bin Laden or block his escape was made by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his top commander, Gen. Tommy Franks.” Elsewhere in the report, and much harsher: “The responsibility for allowing the most wanted man in the world to virtually disappear into thin air lies with the American commanders who refused to commit the necessary U.S. soldiers and Marines to finish the job.”

You think maybe one of those guys named in the report would take to the air waves or the op-ed pages to rebut this in the next 24-48 hours? Quick excerpts below:

Fewer than 100 American commandos were on the scene with their Afghan allies and calls for reinforcements to launch an assault were rejected. Requests were also turned down for U.S. troops to block the mountain paths leading to sanctuary a few miles away in Pakistan. The vast array of American military power, from sniper teams to the most mobile divisions of the Marine Corps and the Army, was kept on the sidelines. Instead, the U.S. command chose to rely on airstrikes and untrained Afghan militias to attack bin Laden and on Pakistan’s loosely organized Frontier Corps to seal his escape routes. On or around December 16, two days after writing his will, bin Laden and an entourage of bodyguards walked unmolested out of Tora Bora and disappeared into Pakistan’s unregulated tribal area. Most analysts say he is still there today.

The decision not to deploy American forces to go after bin Laden or block his escape was made by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his top commander, Gen. Tommy Franks, the architects of the unconventional Afghan battle plan known as Operation Enduring Freedom. Rumsfeld said at the time that he was concerned that too many U.S. troops in Afghanistan would create an anti-American backlash and fuel a widespread insurgency. Reversing the recent American military orthodoxy known as the Powell doctrine, the Afghan model emphasized minimizing the U.S. presence by relying on small, highly mobile teams of special operations troops and CIA paramilitary operatives working with the Afghan opposition. Even when his own commanders and senior intelligence officials in Afghanistan and Washington argued for dispatching more U.S. troops, Franks refused to deviate from the plan.[…]After bin Laden’s escape, some military and intelligence analysts and the press criticized the Pentagon’s failure to mount a full-scale attack despite the tough rhetoric by President Bush. Franks, Vice President Dick Cheney and others defended the decision, arguing that the intelligence was inconclusive about the Al Qaeda leader’s location. But the review of existing literature, unclassified government records and interviews with central participants underlying this report removes any lingering doubts and makes it clear that Osama bin Laden was within our grasp at Tora Bora.[…]Regardless of the exact number of enemy fighters, assaulting Tora Bora would have been difficult and probably would have cost many American and Afghan lives. The Special Operations Command’s history offered this tightly worded assessment: ‘‘With large numbers of well-supplied, fanatical AQ troops dug into extensive fortified positions, Tora Bora appeared to be an extremely tough target.’’ For Dalton Fury, the reward would have been worth the risk. ‘‘In general, I definitely think it was worth the risk to the force to assault Tora Bora for Osama bin Laden,’’ he told the Committee staff. ‘‘What other target out there, then or now, could be more important to our nation’s struggle in the global war on terror?’’[…]The responsibility for allowing the most wanted man in the world to virtually disappear into thin air lies with the American commanders who refused to commit the necessary U.S. soldiers and Marines to finish the job.[…]For American taxpayers, the financial costs of the conflict have been staggering. The first eight years cost an estimated $243 billion and about $70 billion has been appropriated for the current fiscal year—a figure that does not include any increase in troops. But the highest price is being paid on a daily basis in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where 68,000 American troops and hundreds of U.S. civilians are engaged in the ninth year of a protracted conflict and the Afghan people endure a third decade of violence. So far, about 950 U.S. troops and nearly 600 allied soldiers have lost their lives in Operation Enduring Freedom, a conflict in which the outcome remains in grave doubt in large part because the extremists behind the violence were not eliminated in 2001.

Read the entire report here.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Your Best Birth by Ricki Lake and Abby Epstein


Stars: ****1/2

Subtitle: Know All Your Options, Discover the Natural Choices and Take Back the Birth Experience

Summary: After making "The Business of Being Born", Ricki Lake and Abby Epstein decided to pool their information on childbirth and create a book. The goal of the book is to help pregnant women make informed decisions about their birth instead of just doing whatever they are told by others. The authors seem to favour a more natural approach but give you the ups and downs of the different choices and ultimately let you decide what's best for you.

Topics include: WHERE to give birth, Obstetricians and Midwives, Doulas, who should be at birth, section for sexual abuse survivors, epidurals, inductions, electric monitors, episiotomies/vacuum/forceps, C-section and VBAC, loving your labor and bonding with baby. I can't find the name of it but I read a similar book when I was pregnant the first time (2005) and it seemed to have been an older book but it was very informative. This book covers most of the same topics but has less on each topic. This however is probably a good thing as most parents wouldn't have read the first book I mentioned as it was very long and technical.

In between words from the author are short stories of "Birth Goddesses" which are real people (sometimes celebrities) who had an exceptional birth or stood up for what they wanted or something similar. These stories can be inspirational. You'll also find some sidebars on such topics as breech birth, questions to ask your doctor, drug-free induction, breathing techniques and more.

My only qualm about the book was that it's health information is U.S. specific. I'm Canadian and so the talk about insurance and costs of birth didn't apply. However you can just ignore those parts and find out your own insurance info. But I do think it's important to know.

I think knowing your options and making a thorough birth plan is VERY important to any pregnant women. If you are pregnant or plan to be soon, get this book.

Links of Interest
My Best Birth (ning community by authors), Your Best Birth Q & A Video, The Business of Being Born
Buy Your Best Birth at Amazon.com

Other Reviews
The Opinionated Parent, Devourer of Books

Friday, November 27, 2009

Video of the Week: Ian Goldin: Navigating our global future

As globalization and technological advances bring us hurtling towards a new integrated future, Ian Goldin warns that not all people may benefit equally. But, he says, if we can recognize this danger, we might yet realize the possibility of improved life for everyone.

Take a look at Ian Goldin's jam-packed CV and you'll see why he was appointed the first Director of Oxford University's new think tank-cum-research center, the 21st Century School: Goldin battled apartheid in his native South Africa, supported freedom movements in Chile and Nicaragua, worked as an agriculture consultant around the globe in the '80s, served as a development adviser to Nelson Mandela and, as the VP of the World Bank, led collaborations with the UN on global development strategy.

At the 21st Century School, with a diverse brigade of top researchers from the hard and social sciences, he plans to bring fresh thinking to bear on the big, looming issues of the next 100 years: climate change, disruptive technological advancements, aging, bio-ethics, infectious disease, poverty, political conflict.

"End poverty, reverse climate change, eliminate infectious diseases, stop global conflict. It sounds like a Miss World contestant's wish-list. But when Oxford University's latest baby has these aspirations as its stated goals, you have to take them rather more seriously." - John Crace, The Guardian. (Video duration: 7:07)

From ted.com | See interactive transcript of talk here.

Related links:

21st Century School

Ian Goldin’s Webpage

What Are We Doing in Afghanistan?

Hamid Karzai reviews troops of the first gradu...Image via Wikipedia

I’ll tell you but it’s off the record …

The Deputy Ambassador of US Embassy Kabul, Frank Ricciardone was apparently over at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University recently for an evening lecture titled, “What Are We Doing in Afghanistan?” He sat down with The Herald staff writer Monique Vernon to talk about his life as a diplomat and about American relations with Afghanistan but requested that his lecture be “off the record.”

He was asked about his advice for students who are considering a career in foreign policy? His response:

"I had five years of being a schoolteacher in Italy and then Iran, and I’m really glad I did that rather then jumping right into federal service. You can see the world in a different way, and I think I am a better diplomat for having lived among people in Iran and all over Europe on a very low budget."

He was asked about our biggest foreign policy challenge in the AfPak region, and he had this to say:

“Our mission is to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda and its extremist allies in Pakistan and Afghanistan and prevent their return to either country in the future. Within that, we try to boil it down to a three-word motto, and the words that the Afghans like to hear are peace, justice and prosperity.”
He had a couple more paragraphs here.

As to why the lecture was open to the public but off the record, Ambassador Ricciardone gave a nice spin that sounds reasonable enough:

"There is kind of a custom, an interface between government and diplomacy and academia … It’s good to have that freedom where I don’t have to worry about someone extracting something and making a headline out of it at a moment of intense public interest in the foreign policy question of Afghanistan. I am a government official after all, and … I need to take great care that I faithfully represent the programs and the policies of the United States of America.

I thought that by making it off the record we could have a slightly more candid conversation with the question and answer part. Especially being around students as bright as Brown students are, I wanted to be able to give everyone a freer reign … It adds a level of protection, I think, for the decision-makers (in Washington)."

Huh? Read the entire Q&A here.

Did “gotcha journalism” cross his mind when he thought “bright Brown students?”

I am trying hard to be sympathetic to Ambassador’s Ricciardone’s position here. But I am having a mighty hard time. Here is one of our top career diplomats talking about what is currently our top foreign policy engagement. I am wondering on the purpose of giving a lecture titled “What Are We Doing in Afghanistan?” if one can only explain it off the record to a limited number of seats populated by Brown University students?

“Someone extracting something…” well now, how can one not extract a bite given this President’s position on transparency and open government? The question I have is really quite simple. How can one engage the public effectively on Afghanistan given that a simple lecture is treated like an NIE?

As to adding a level of protection “for the decision makers (in Washington)” – whoops! Sorry, I think I fell off my chair when I read that.

Ambassador Neumann on Corruption in Afghanistan

Ronald E.Image via Wikipedia

"Corruption in Afghanistan has evolved over the years of war. Senior leaders taking a cut of projects may not be liked but the practice is long standing and has not traditionally sparked enormous discontent. But the years of warfare have produced a much more wide spread corruption in the society. When there is a pervasive sense of insecurity, when officials are not sure their government will continue, wonder whether they may have to flee to exile and lack any reason to believe they will ever enjoy a pension or even a living wage there is every incentive to profit from any position to safeguard themselves, their families and their friends. Without confidence in the future there is no basis for a sense of civic duty. This is the situation we face today. If every corrupt official were fired tomorrow I have no reason to doubt that the problem would shortly reemerge with the new cadre. This is not a counsel of despair. Other societies have emerged from prolonged period of instability. But it is a reminder that change will be slow and difficult and there are no silver bullets on single policy choices that will provide rapid change. In doing so we will have to pay attention also to the frequent assertions that our and other donors aid is fueling corruption through the actions of contractors and their interaction with Afghan subsidiaries."

Ronald E. NeumannUS Ambassador to Afghanistan ((2005-2007)Testimony at the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign AffairsCommittee on Oversight and Government ReformNovember 17, 2009

Reconsider the Role of the PRTs?

Col. Mark Fields, commander, 189th Infantry Br...Image via Wikipedia

Gilles Dorronsoro, a Visiting Scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace gave a testimony last week at the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Part of his testimony questions the role of the PRTs in Afghanistan; something that frankly, I have not heard brought up before. The prevailing wisdom seems to be that this war cannot be won militarily and that we need the civilians over there pronto. Since we are ramping up the civilian uplift with 974 additional personnel in the next couple of months, the question about the role of the PRTs in Afghanistan is an interesting and relevant one. Below is an excerpt:

Development is not the key in Afghanistan. The Afghans do not choose their political allegiances based on the level of aid. Economic aid is not a practical way to gain control of a territory, and it plays a marginal role in the war. Rather, whoever controls the territory is the most important factor in Afghans’ political allegiances. In other words, development must come after military control in the strategic areas, as a consolidating process. Aid is also not instrumental in ddressing the central issues of an exit strategy. Development should be territorially concentrated in the strategic areas, where it can reinforce the institutions.

If this analysis is correct, the Coalition should reconsider the role of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs). What is their supposed strategic impact? I would argue that the PRTs are ineffective in state building and also of limited utility in preparing for withdrawal; hence, they should not be a priority. The PRT concept is technically useful in some cases, but it is a long-term liability for Western forces because it takes the place of the Afghan state, marginalizing Afghan players. If Western troops are in charge, there is no reason not to give civil operations to real NGOs or Afghan institutions. Moreover, the PRTs are unable to significantly change the perceptions of the Afghan population. Local populations are essentially dependent on whoever controls the territories in which they live.

Read the whole statement here.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Ripley's Believe It Or Not! Seeing is Believing


Stars: *****

Ripley's has been reporting on the world's weirdest sites for I don't know how long. Each year since 2005 they publish an annual. It's basically a huge compendium of oddities. The 2010 version is this book, Seeing is Believing.

Just to give you an idea of what's included in this book, here are the chapter headings: Strange But True, Extreme Earth, Incredible Feats, Unusual Customs, Crazy Creatures, Travel Tales, Fantastic Food, Body Oddity, Strange Sites, Artistic License, Amazing Science and Beyond Belief. I'll mention more about some of what I read later.

In addition to all these strange facts, you'll find 100s if not 1000s of color photos, some Ripley's Research side bars which explain some extra info on certain info tidbits and occasional little reminders to check out the Ripley Books website for videos that match some of the stories in the book. If you want to get an idea of the layout, check out the Annual section of the website and choose the Look Inside! link.

Now I'd like to share a few of the stories I found most interesting:

pg 28 - In August 2007, bathers in the sea at Yamba, Australia found themselves in what looked like a giant bubble bath, when thick sea foam started to wash in on the beach. (believed to be organisms, dead fish and seaweed churned by the waves)

pg 73 - Competitors taking part in the Shepherd's Shemozzle race in the annual Huntaway Festival in Hunterville, New Zealand have to bite into bulls' testicles and carry them along a course as part of the endurance race.

pg 86 - Psychological counselor Xu Yiqiang demonstrated the art of hypnotizing chickens in Xi'an, northwest China, in 2007. (photos included!)

pg 160 - Rick from Montreal, Canada, known simply as "Zombie: is covered head to toe in corpse-like tattoos, complete witha skull etched on his face, a detailed spine down his back and brains painted onto his head. His amazing body-art took more than 24 hours to complete and cost almost $7000.

Links of Interest
Follow @RipleyWorld on Twitter. *highly recommended*, Seeing is Believing Book on Facebook, The Official Ripley Blog,
Buy Ripley's Believe It or Not! Seeing is Believing at Amazon.com

Other Reviews
Cupcake Witch, She is Too Fond of Books, Steph Su Reads, Worducopia, Cindy's Love of Books, Melissa's Bookshelf, A Bookworm's World, Book Reviews by Bobbie, Bookin' With Bingo,

Happy Thanksgiving!

Diplopundit wishes you a Happy Thanksgiving with loved ones and good friends! The ISS astronauts send their greetings from space. Aboard the International Space Station, Expedition 21 Flight Engineers Jeff Williams and Nicole Stott of NASA demonstrated some of the food they will enjoy on Thanksgiving Day and shared their thoughts on the holiday season from 220 miles above the Earth.
Video from NASAtelevision

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

SFRC Website Finally Gets a Make Over, Sort Of

Screen Capture of New SFRC Website

The much awaited make-over of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee page is finally here. The new website looks classy, has a better layout than the previous one and much better photos (except that they’re still using Senator Lugar’s old photo). The main page includes a welcome message from the SFRC Chairman, photos of both the chairman and the ranking member on its landing page, as well as the names of committee members and the list of subcommittees. It has links to the hearings page, and the press sites for both the chairman and the ranking member. The “About” page includes links to Committee History and Committee Rules and Jurisdiction.

There is a link to the contact page at the very bottom of each page. But don’t get your hopes up because it looks like a “cut and paste” thingy from the previous website:

U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations446 Dirksen Senate Office BuildingWashington, DC 20510-6225

Majority Phone: (202) 224-4651 Minority Phone: (202) 224-6797For internship information with the Majority Office,please send email to democrat_interns@foreign.senate.gov.For internship information with the Minority Office,please send email to katie_lee@foreign.senate.gov.

Back in February Brian Young, the new webmaster on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff had a piece on TPM about updating the SFRC website. Part of what he posted at TPM below:

Because we're not just looking to spruce up the website, drag it into the 21st century with links to press releases, video of hearings, etc, etc. We want to do more than that; we want to create a website worthy of the Committee. Of all Committees in Congress, this is the one most suited for a powerful, interactive website.This is a priority for Senator Kerry. He hired me with this in mind. He wants a site that creates a portal into the foreign policy deliberations this nation needs to have to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

This site will be designed to involve people in a conversation about the future of this country's foreign policy.

I don’t know if this site has been officially rolled out. My old link just went dark and so I had to look this up. I can find the links to the prepared testimonies but can find no links to the hearing videos at this time nor any of the promised “interactive” thingies.

Something that would also not make the general constituents happy is the absence of a a real contact page for the committee staff. I hope this is still a work in progress.

Recently somebody wrote to us about a certain ambassadorial nomination. When told to contact the SFRC, the writer complained that he/she had already contacted the senator representing his/her state. And that trying to contact the chairman or the ranking member of the SFRC was almost impossible. The offices wanted to know if you’re a constituent before they talk to you. I can understand the need for this when it comes to the individual offices of the senators. But the Committee has its own staff; can’t they – you know, assign a catch-all email or a fax number for the interested public?

Related Post:SFRC Website Make Over - When?

Social Media Related Tweets and Insights

From my Twitter account:

Teaching With Twitter: Not for the Faint of Heart http://bit.ly/4DuguL and http://bit.ly/x1q5G

Google Reader adds favicon support for RSS subscriptions http://bit.ly/8X1KLo - It looks good, give it a try.

Amazon announces firmware upgrade with better battery life and native PDF support for Kindle2 http://bit.ly/8qrmiL and http://bit.ly/12a7Jw -- Kindle support for PDF and screen rotation work very well - you can carry a full course/subject review with 100-200 presentations or more.

Are you a natural-born blogger? http://bit.ly/8RMpkv

Starting early: Discussing Blog Design in 5th Grade http://bit.ly/57Unf7)

For most blogs, the label "Classic Post" is really a misnomer... :)

@paulocoelho: "Difficulty" is the name of an ancient tool created to define who we are.

@TheTeacherPage: "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." Attributed to both Andy McIntyre and Derek Bok

Recipe correction: http://bit.ly/4XcaGK

Tweets are not research articles - they are 140-character messages - please always go to the original source, links, etc. Tweets and links do not represent endorsement, approval or support. Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.

Health News of the Day

Health News of the Day is a daily summary made from the selected links I post on Twitter. It is in a bullet points format with links to the original sources which include 350 RSS feeds that produce about 2,500 items per day:

Cigarettes are "widely contaminated" with hundreds of different types of bacteria - as many as there are chemicals http://bit.ly/5ITL1p

Urinary adiponectin is a novel marker for vasculopathy in DM2 http://bit.ly/50gyUT

Confirmed: High salt intake is associated with increased risk of stroke and total cardiovascular disease. http://bit.ly/9267Ev -- The case for population-wide salt reduction to prevent cardiovascular disease gets stronger http://bit.ly/6sBdsw

The Cost of Obesity in the United States (Graphic) http://bit.ly/6xlaxM

Medical news tweets are not research articles - they are 140-character messages - please always go to the original source, links, etc. Tweets and links do not represent endorsement, approval or support. Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.

Follow me on Twitter:

Michael Jordan: I’ve failed over and over again. And that’s why I succeed



Video: Michael Jordan "Failure" Nike Commercial. "I’ve missed 9000 shots. I’ve lost 399 games. I’ve failed over and over again. And that’s why I succeed".

Related:
"The ultimate competitor will never stop competing even though he won the fight long ago" http://goo.gl/SVLZ

Hard Skills Training Center at Old Smelting Plant Site?

The emblem of Recovery.gov, the official site ...Image via Wikipedia

Our blog friend TSB over at The Skeptical Bureaucrat recently had an interesting post on the Contaminated Industrial Site Proposed for Diplomatic Security Training Center.

A local official was quoted saying "Given that Eastalco was there smelting aluminum and there was enough of a buffer," the 150-acre training center in the middle of a 2,000-acre site shouldn't be a problem.”

TSB’s translation: “By which he apparently meant that the training center's presence shouldn't bother local residents because the center will be right smack in the middle of the hazardous waste left behind by decades of aluminum smelting, and not close to them. Whether that should be a problem for the hundreds of DSS employees who would work and train at the center, Delegate Weldon didn't say.”

The site can be cleaned up for a mere cost of roughly $200 million -- “sufficiently to use it as a landfill.” Politicians are getting into the act, lobbying for the center to be built in their own backyards. Read TSB’s whole post here. Also read this on Eastalco’s plan on marketing the site for new uses.

The State Department is overseeing $600 million of investment for seven projects and a funds transfer to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The training center at issue here is the Hard Skills Training Center, one of its seven projects. The plan calls for its location within 150 miles of Washington, D.C., The Eastalco site is located about 45 miles from D.C.

Here is State Department’s summary for the training center:

Construct a training facility capable of supporting hard skills security-related training for the Department and the wider foreign affairs community. The existing security training infrastructure is not sufficient to meet current and projected training needs. Recovery Act funds along with regular Worldwide Security and Protection (WSP) appropriated funds will enable the Department to construct a hard skills training campus that meets the increased demand for security training and makes the delivery of security training more efficient than the current arrangement of 15 separate locations throughout the United States. Specifically, the Foreign Affairs Counter Threat course, already mandated for federal employees assigned to only five specific posts, will be expanded to include all critical and high threat posts worldwide. This project will enable the Department to provide vital security training to law enforcement and security staff and all foreign affairs employees; especially those assigned to critical and high threat posts.

This hard skills training facility will use both ARRA stimulus funds and WSP funding. Currently, the Department has $105.5 million programmed to support this project ($70 M ARRA, $17.55M FY 2009 WSP, and another $18M in WSP) in FY2009. Subsequent phases of the project will be funded through WSP. The FY 2010 budget request seeks an additional $12.5M to bring annual WSP funding for this project to $30 million/year. As requested in the joint explanatory statement accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, P.L. 110-161), the Department produced a report in May 2008 outlining the Department’s increased need for security training and provided the initial project concepts for a training facility as part of a consolidated security training complex. The report called for the development of a master plan starting with an Architectural & Engineering (A&E) study to help frame the project scope, cost and timelines. Those initial project studies will be completed with ARRA and WSP funds.

In addition, ARRA and FY 2009 WSP funds will be used to complete Phase 1 of the training facility. The consideration and funding of any possible future phases will be subject to annual funding availability and prioritization in the annual budget process. The project concept is to deliver functioning training facilities at the completion of each phase of the project and not have any partially completed training venues.

The State Department is also using ARRA funds for a Data Center – “The Data Center program ($120 million) will build an enterprise data center in the western United States and consolidate all domestic servers into four enterprise data centers.”

I wonder if anyone is interested in pitching for that...