Most health and medical blog posts highlighted and provided commentary pertaining to medical issues found in external media such as books, television, Web sites, magazines, and newspapers
Only 16% contained actual health or medical information.
Distinct differences in patterns of content were evident between credentialed and noncredentialed bloggers, as well as different blog hosts.
References:
Health and medical blog content and its relationships with blogger credentials and blog host. Buis LR, Carpenter S. Health Commun. 2009 Dec;24(8):703-10.
Comments from Google Buzz:
Shabber Hussain - Now if I can some how know about those 16% medical blogs that "contain actual health or medical information", it should make my day. Feb 26
Arin Basu - I think (I just read the abstract perhaps a closer reading of the full text of the article might be more useful, @Ves, did you have a chance to read the full text?)
* The findings are not unexpected, at least that's what you expect based on "credentialing the blogger who has written the posts"
* There seems on first reading at leas the abstract that there may be quite a bit of bias in that study (just one week snapshot (too few blogs sampled), few selected sites (selection bias right there), and interpretation)
* Not surprised that most blogs contained commentaries published in popular press and journals.
I think that's what blogs should ideally do. Raise awareness, enable and alert people to read & interpret meanings. I'd not expect blogs to replace "actual" texts (well, that's my perspective)
* Which makes @Shabber's point very pertinent, what are those 16% saying, on a one week selective sampling?
All in all, a very interesting article. I think it needs to be closely read and discussed in medical blogosphere. Feb 26
All in all, a very interesting article. I think it needs to be closely read and discussed in medical blogosphere. Feb 26
Image source: public domain.