Try to solve my conundrum and identify the following person - who is far too modest to reveal the following data although it may be relevant for many people to form their opinion:
- much like Albert Einstein, he is often considered to be an outsider in the field in which he is moderately famous today
- he stood first among his countrymates in an international math contest at the high school
- he comes from the second territorially largest country in the world
- he studied pure math at the University of T., and typically stood 2nd
- the country may be the same country where the first commenter under this article lives, and the T. city is the city where "casting is coming" according to her blog
- he was offered a full scholarship for PhD in mathematical economics at MIT when such offers were rare
- Paul Samuelson (Nobel prize in 1970) made this offer by phone
- it won't help you but a nephew of the P.S. above is the president of a certain well-known university in Massachusetts
- among the mathematical adjectives, our mystery man always liked "elegant" and "nontrivial"
- however, he chose a job of a director of various "search companies" unrelated to the Internet
- he is often viewed as an opponent of a person who is not a clear thinker and who uses inflated terminology to describe trivial operations
- this opponent is thus very inelegant, but the opponent's work has really been rejected because it was methodologically flawed
- the last name of the opponent means a person of politically incorrect sex in a major European language
- the second largest country mentioned above also recently happens to be the second most successful country in a certain sport, after the Czech Republic
- a certain tool is necessary for this game
- our mysterious person has become very famous for playing with this tool, although normally he prefers to spend his leisure time with squash
- The Reference Frame estimates that his mathematical IQ exceeds that of those who essentially paint him as an amateurish outsider roughly by 15 in average, and a similar comparison holds for his effectivity, accuracy, and breadth of his analyses
- he has a blog whose quality, extent, and usefulness is higher by one order of magnitude than a blog of his opponents, although the number of these opponents is higher by an order of magnitude than the number of mysterious men you are trying to identify
- in 2007, he will be able to reverse-engineer NASA's data and find a bug that will be corrected and 1934 will become the warmest U.S. year on record instead of 1998
